Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lian Tran vs Danique Havermans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tran vs Havermans analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Lian Tran vs Danique Havermans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tran 0 - 0 Havermans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tran has won 37.93% of points on their second serve, while Havermans has won 43.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tran, in recent form, has won 62.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Havermans has won 59.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.77% and 40.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tran has saved 43.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Havermans has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tran has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Havermans winning 40.74% (W/L 11/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tran has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 63/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5). Havermans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Tran has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.88% of matches (W/L 19/ 15), where as Havermans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tran has played against opponents with an average rank of 146.42 while Havermans has played against players with an average rank of 24.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tran has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Havermans has won 14% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tran has converted 49.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Havermans has converted 57.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
578
Rank
576
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
Form
52% (123-113)
Career Total W/L
40% (22-33)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lian Tran vs Danique Havermans For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tran VS Havermans
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lian Tran | Danique Havermans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (23/23) | 43% (6/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (203/212) | 47% (65/74) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 161.58 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (847/1253) | 59% (138/235) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (465/847) | 64% (89/138) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (154/406) | 43% (42/97) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (93/188) | 58% (15/26) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (669/1357) | 49% (102/209) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (2/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (3/0) |
Lian Tran Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Lian Tran
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
52%
(
28 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Ania Hertel
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Lian Tran
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Lilian Poling
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Lian Tran
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
8
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
51%
(
36 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 1-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Csilla Fodor
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
21%
(
6 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
52%
(
31 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Ria Dernikovic
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Lian Tran
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Lian Tran
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Danique Havermans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Danique Havermans
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-6(2) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danique Havermans
Player
Chrystal Lopez
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carina Syrtveit
Player
Danique Havermans
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danique Havermans
Player
Emma Van Poppel
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-6(5) 11-9 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mariam Atia
Player
Danique Havermans
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorena Schaedel
Player
Danique Havermans
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tran Vs Havermans Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tran are available here and Havermans photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
